Monday, November 2, 2009

Notice

Several articles were published in the blog today. Make sure you check them all, especially those at the end.

Glen

Gary Davenport

Geese

It’s those stately geese I find especially impressive. Winging their way to a warmer climate, they often cover thousands of miles before reaching their destination. Have you ever studied why they fly as they do? It is fascinating to read what has been discovered about their flight pattern as well as their in-flight habits. Four come to mind.

1. Those in front rotate their leadership. When one lead goose gets tired, it changes places with one in the wing of the V-formation and another flies point.

2. By flying as they do, the members of the flock create an upward air current for one another. Each flap of the wings literally creates an uplift for the bird immediately following. One author states that by flying in a V-formation, the whole flock gets 71 percent greater flying range than if each goose flew on its own.

3. When one goose gets sick or wounded, two fall out of formation with it and follow it down to help and protect it. They stay with the struggler until it’s able to fly again.

4. The geese in the rear of the formation are the ones who do the honking. I suppose it’s their way of announcing that they’re following and that all is well. For sure, the repeated honks encourage those in front to stay at it.

As I think about all this, one lesson stands out above all others: it is the natural instinct of geese to work together. Whether it’s rotating, flapping, helping, or simply honking, the flock is in it together...which enables them to accomplish what they set out to do.

A Good Leader

Leadership is the ability to put the plans into practice, and to accomplish the specified objectives through the skillful management of people, time, and tangible resources. A good leader is one who is able to motivate people; one who is capable of making good decisions, even under pressure or in conditions of uncertainty; one who can guide people through actions as well as words.

A Leader Is…

Peter Drucker, perhaps the most noted authority on leadership in the 20^th century, says: A leader is one who has followers. An effective leader is not someone who is loved or admired. He is someone whose followers do the right thing. Popularity is not leadership, results are. Leaders are highly visible. They, therefore, set examples. Leadership is not rank or privileges, titles or money. Leadership is responsibility.

Advice

Caution to newly promoted executives—remember what the mamma whale told the baby whale: “When you get to the top and start letting off steam, that’s the time you’re most apt to be harpooned.”
A football coach gave this advice on how to deal with failures. “When you’re about to be run out of town, get out in front and make it look like you’re heading a parade.”

Advice from Ross Perot

Advice from Ross Perot about how to treat your people:

“Never ask anyone to do what you haven’t done before and wouldn’t do again. That’s a pretty fundamental rule in leadership...treat them like you treat yourself. Things you don’t like, they don’t like. You don’t like to be jerked around, they don’t either. You don’t like to be talked down to, and they don’t either. You would rather work with somebody than for somebody. So would they. You hate people who pound on your head after you gave everything you had and failed… It’s that simple.”

Authority

The concept of authority as something that causes another person to “do what you want him to do” is reflected in most definitions. For instance, the Random House Dictionary of the English Language speaks of authority as “a power or right to direct the actions or thoughts of others. Authority is a power or right, usually because of rank or office, to issue commands and to punish for violations.” Again the root idea seems to be control or direction of the actions of others.

We see this same idea even in sophisticated examinations of authority. For instance, William Oncken, Jr., in a 1970 Colorado Institute of Technology Journal, gives an analysis of authority that suggests it is comprised of four elements:

1. The Authority of Competence: the more competent the other fellow knows you are, the more confident he will be that you know what you are talking about and the more likely he will be to follow your orders, requests, or suggestions. He will think of you as an authority in the matter under consideration and will feel it risky to ignore your wishes.

2. The Authority of Position: This component gives you the right to tell someone, “Do it or else.” It has teeth. “The boss wants it” is a bugle call that can snap many an office or shop into action.

3. The Authority of Personality: The easier it is for the other fellow to talk to you, to listen to you, or to work with you, the easier he will find it to respond to your wishes.

4. The Authority of Character: This component is your “credit rating” with other people as to your integrity, reliability, honesty, loyalty, sincerity, personal morals, and ethics. Obviously you will get more and better from a man who has respect for your character than from one who hasn’t.

Biblical Teaching on Leadership

The following principles of leadership emerge from biblical teaching:

1. Christian leaders should be certain that their goal is to serve God and others, not to receive the title or honor that comes with leadership.

2. Leaders should not use their position for their own advantage or comfort. No task should be “beneath” them—although some tasks may be delegated. They should not ask others to do what they are unwilling to do themselves..

3. Leaders will seek to distinguish their own preferences from the will and welfare of the group as a whole.

4. Normally the position should seek the leader. There may be some situations in which persons may apply or volunteer. Nevertheless, when someone strongly desires a particular responsibility, his or her motivation should be carefully examined.

5. We must learn to see each other as valuable to the Lord and basically equal in his sight.

Building a Personality

Leadership is not magnetic personality. That can just as well be a glib tongue.

It is not making friends and influencing people; that is flattery.

Leadership is lifting a person’s vision to higher sights, the raising of a person’s performance to higher standards, the building of a personality beyond its normal limitations.

Corporate Managers

A study was recently completed on corporate managers. In it they were asked if they voiced positions that (1) focused on the good of the company, rather than personal benefit and (2) jeopardized their own careers. Emerging from this study were the four leader-types which are found in all organizations.

Type #1—courageous. These people expressed ideas to help the company improve, in spite of personal risk or opposition.

Type #2—confronting. These people spoke up, but only because of a personal vendetta against the company.

Type #3—calloused. These people didn’t know, or care, whether they could do anything for the ompany; they felt helpless and hopeless, so they kept quiet.

Type #4—conforming. These people also remained quiet, but only because they loathed confrontation and loved approval.

The researchers discovered that the courageous managers accomplished the most, reported the highest job satisfaction, and eventually were commended by superiors. Their commitment had certainly improved the quality of their lives.

Courage: You Can Stand Strong in the Face of Fear, Jon Johnston, 1990, SP Publications, pp. 138-139

Definitions of Leadership

Leadership is influence, the ability of one person to influence others. One man can lead others only to the extent that he can influence them. This fact is supported by definitions of leadership by men who have themselves wielded great influence.

Lord Montgomery defines it in these terms: “Leadership is the capacity and will to rally men and women to a common purpose, and the character which inspires confidence.”

Dr. John R. Mott, a world leader in student circles, gave as his definition: “A leader is a man who knows the road, who can keep ahead, and who can pull others after him.”

President Truman’s definition is: “A leader is a person who has the ability to get others to do what they don’t want to do, and like it.”...

Lord Montgomery enunciated seven ingredients necessary in a leader in war, each of which is appropriate to the spiritual warfare:

(1) He should be able to sit back and avoid getting immersed in detail.
(2) He must not be petty.
(3) He must not be pompous.
(4) He must be a good picker of men.
(5) He should trust those under him, and let them get on with their job without interference.
(6) He must have the power of clear decision.
(7) He should inspire confidence.

Dr. John R. Mott moved in student circles and his tests covered different territory:

(1) Does he do little things well?
(2) Has he learned the meaning of priorities?
(3) How does he use his leisure?
(4) Has he intensity?
(5) Has he learned to take advantage of momentum?
(6) Has he the power of growth?
(7) What is his attitude to discouragements?
(8) How does he face impossible situations?
(9) What are his weakest points?

J. O. Sanders in Spiritual Leadership, pp. 19-24

Do It Anyway

1. People are illogical, unreasonable and self-centered.	Love them anyway.
2. If you do good, people will accuse you of selfish ulterior motives.	Do good anyway.
3. If you are successful, you win false friends and true enemies.	Succeed anyway.
4. The good you do today will be forgotten tomorrow.	Do good anyway.
5. Honesty and frankness make you vulnerable.	Be honest and frank anyway.
6. The biggest men with the biggest ideas can be shot down by the smallest men with the smallest minds	Think big anyway.
7. People favor underdogs, but follow only top dogs	Fight for a few underdogs anyway.
8. What you spend years building may be destroyed overnight.	Build anyway.
9. People really need help, but may attack you if you do help them.	Help them anyway.
10. Give the world the best you have and you’ll get kicked in the teeth.	Give the world the best you have anyway.

David Augsberger, When Enough is Enough, (Ventura, CA: Regal Books, 1984), pp. 109-130

Finding Good Leaders

What kind of person is best able to involve others and himself in good decision making? J. Keith Louden lists seven qualities:

1. The ability to look ahead and see what’s coming—foresight.

2. Steadiness, with patience and persistence and courage.

3. A buoyant spirit that in spite of cares generates confidence.

4. Ingeniousness, the ability to solve problems soundly yet creatively.

5. The ability to help others.

6. Righteousness, the willingness to do the right thing and speak the truth.

7. Personal morality of a quality that commands the respect of others.

Charles W.L. Foreman, “Managing a Decision Into Being,” from the Management Course for Presidents, pp. 3-4.

Five Characteristics of a Leader

John W. Gardner, former Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, who is now directing a leadership study project in Washington, D.C., has pinpointed five characteristics that set “leader” managers apart from run-of-the-mill managers:

1. They are long-term thinkers who see beyond the day’s crisis and the quarterly report.

2. Their interest in the company does not stop with the unit they are heading. They want to know how all of the company’s departments affect one another, and they are constantly reaching beyond their specific area of influence.

3. They put heavy emphasis on vision, values, and motivation.

4. They have strong people skills.

5. They don’t accept the status quo.

Lead Others

Actually, a manager needs the ability not only to make good decisions himself, but also to lead others to make good decisions. Charles Moore, after four years of research at the United Parcel Service reached the following conclusions:

1. Good decisions take a lot of time.

2. Good decisions combine the efforts of a number of people.

3. Good decisions give individuals the freedom to dissent.

4. Good decisions are reached without any pressure from the top to reach an artificial consensus.

5. Good decisions are based on the participation of those responsible for implementing them.*

One Man

Wherever anything is to be done, either in the Church or in the world, you may depend upon it, it is done by one man. The whole history of the Church, from the earliest ages, teaches the same lesson. A Moses, a Gideon, an Isaiah, and a Paul are from time to time raised up to do an appointed work; and when they pass away, their work appears to cease. Nor is it given to everyone, as it was to Moses, to see the Joshua who is destined to carry on his work to completion.

God can raise up a successor to each man, but the man himself is not to worry about that matter, or he may do harm. One great object of every religious teacher should be to prevent the creation of external appliances to make his teaching appear to live when it is dead.

Charles Spurgeon, in Wycliffe Handbook of Preaching & Preachers, W. Wiersbe, p. 223

Position of Leadership

Don’t take a position of leadership in church unless you are prepared to be honest, pure, and loving in your lifestyle. Leadership is a privilege, and with privilege comes responsibility. God holds teachers of His truth doubly responsible because we who lead are in a position where we can either draw people toward Christ or drive them away from Him.

This is illustrated in the life of the famous author Mark Twain. Church leaders were largely to blame for his becoming hostile to the Bible and the Christian faith. As he grew up, he knew elders and deacons who owned slaves and abused them. He heard men using foul language and saw them practice dishonesty during the week after speaking piously in church on Sunday. He listened to ministers use the Bible to justify slavery. Although he saw genuine love for the Lord Jesus in some people, including his mother and his wife, he was so disturbed by the bad teaching and poor example of church leaders that he became bitter toward the things of God.

Indeed, it is a privilege to be an elder, a deacon, a Sunday school teacher, or a Bible club leader. But it is also an awesome responsibility. Let’s make sure we attract people to the Savior rather than turn them away.

Quotes

Dwight Eisenhower described leadership as “The act of getting somebody else to do what you want done because he wants to do it.”
Give your decision, never your reasons; your decisions may be right, your reasons are sure to be wrong. - Lord Mansfield
When it is not necessary to make a decision, it is necessary not to make a decision. - Lucius, Second Lord Falkland
Leadership is the ability to hide your panic from others. - Quoted in MSC Newsletter
Look over your shoulder now and then to be sure someone’s following you. - Virginia State Treasurer, Henry Gilmer
Effective leadership is the willingness to sacrifice for the sake of predetermined objectives. - Ted Engstrom
When a general gets too far ahead of his troops, he’s often mistaken for the enemy. - Anon
Leadership is the discipline of deliberately exerting special influence within a group to move it towards goals of beneficial permanence that fulfills the group’s real needs. - Dr. John Haggai, Lead On!
Experts know what should be done; leaders know what should be done and how to get people to do it. - Quoted in C. Barber, Nehemiah and the Dynamics of Leadership, p. 72.
You can judge leaders by the size of the problems they tackle—people nearly always pick a problem their own size, and ignore or leave to others the bigger or smaller ones. - Anthony Jay, in Bits and Pieces, Sept., 1989
Effective leadership is the willingness to sacrifice for the sake of predetermined objectives. - Ted Engstrom, in Erwin Lutzer, Pastor to Pastor, p. 117.
A leader who keeps his ear to the ground allows his rear end to become a target. - Angie Papadakis
You cannot paint the “Mona Lisa” by assigning one dab each to a thousand painters. - William F. Buckley, Jr.
Do not follow where the path may lead, go instead where there is no path and leave a trail. - Anon
A leader is one who knows the way, goes the way and shows the way. - John Maxwell
A leader is a person with a magnet in his heart and a compass in his head. - Vance Havner
Leadership in the local church should be determined by spirituality, not notoriety. - Tony Evans
The hardest thing to learn in life is which bridge to cross and which to burn. - David Russell
It is small wonder where the shepherds hesitate and stumble, that the sheep draw back affrighted. - Scott Nearing.
The captain of a floundering ship does little good by criticizing the crew to the passengers.
In order to give the illusion of authority, one must make immediate changes. - loose paraphrase of Douglas McArthur
The trouble with being a leader today is that you can’t be sure whether people are following you or chasing you.
One of the tests of leadership is the ability to recognize a problem before it becomes an emergency.

Starling on Leadership

Some of you may want to read Jerry Starling's blog on discipleship: committedtotruth.wordpress.com.

Leadership Development in the Third World

I live in a city that was a crucial bastion during the Civil War and there are several battlefields within throwing distance of the church building. Reeling from defeat at Chickamauga on September 19-20, 1863, Army of the Cumberland forces under the command of William S. Rosecrans retreated to Chattanooga to regroup. Braxton Bragg's men drove to the summit of Lookout Mountain and retook the peak without a fight. With this advantage on the Rebel side, Old Rosy feared losing the city.

Abraham Lincoln was keenly aware of the importance of Chattanooga. The President had said that, "...taking Chattanooga is as important as taking Richmond." Rails from the city linked major distribution centers of the Confederacy; it was a key in his plan to "divide and conquer" the Confederacy.

Early during the war the situation was as grave as could be imagined. Military setbacks defined a difficult summer. As the twilight of autumn dimmed into the cold darkness of winter, rumors swirled around Washington, D.C.: Would the cabinet resign en masse? Would the President himself resign? The national mood was grim, percolating with fear and apprehension.

Moving forward to pierce the difficulties of the day, President Lincoln delivered what some historians consider to be the finest speech of his presidency, but one not recalled by many people today. It was his second annual message to Congress, penned exactly one month prior to signing the controversial Emancipation Proclamation on January 1, 1863, and well before his Gettysburg Address. In his brief speech, Lincoln exhorted his fellow citizens with the following words and breathed courage into a nation split by civil war:

"The dogmas of the quiet past are inadequate to the stormy present. The occasion is piled high with difficulty, and we must rise with the occasion. As our case is new, so we must think anew, and act anew … Fellow citizens … we shall nobly save, or meanly lose, the last, best hope of earth."

Lincoln recognized the reality that demanding, challenging times call for new leadership. The old ways of doing things are inadequate for solving the problems of the present. Difficulties demand new ways of thinking and new ways of leading.

The demands of the present day pose significant challenges, especially for leaders within the body of Christ. There is a growing need to train and develop leaders both in the United States and in the maturing church throughout the world who can adequately lead the church into the future. The question is the “how to” of producing these changes and developing these innovative approaches to leadership.

As Christianity in the West has been either holding steady or declining, the Church in Asia, Africa, and Latin America has been on the rise. In fact, according to Scottish missiologist Andrew Walls, there has been a “massive southward shift of the center of gravity of the Christian world.” From a denominational perspective . . .

· Roughly 2/3 of all Protestants live outside Europe and North America (Miller).

· In 1965 the Christian population of Africa was around 25%. In 2002, it was 46% (Miller).

· According to World Christian Encyclopedia, there are 2 billion Christians in the world, 560 million in Europe, 480 million in Latin America, 360 million in Africa, 313 million in Asia, and 260 million in North America (Jenkins). (A “Christian” being anyone who professes belief in Christ.)

· Publications from the church of Christ state that there are more members of the body outside the United States than in. Especially is that true in Latin America and Africa. (cf. http://www.christianchronicle.org/article2158819~The_changing_face_of_the_church)

As Christianity shifts, it will be redefined through the lens of other cultures, not through a Western understanding. We need to allow those cultures to establish their own traditions. Although Christian tradition rests primarily with North America, its future may be in Latin America, Asia, and Africa. These regions tend to be overall more conservative in their views, and the battles that have swung toward liberalism in the U.S. and Europe may pan out differently in those areas of the world, if they arise at all.

The Third World, for the most part, does not hold formal training in a Christian institution such as college, university, or graduate school as a prerequisite for leading and ministering a church. The “schools of preaching” have been the major tool for training preachers and teachers in these developing areas with Sunset International Bible Institute (SIBI) leading the way. Several factors contribute to this trend.

First, the rate at which the church in the Third World is growing places a higher demand for leaders than formal institutions can produce.

According to a 1999 report by Dr. Flip Buys, “theological educational institutions like universities and seminaries provide less than 10% of the need for trained leaders. The other 80‐90% will only be reached through new innovative ways of (non‐formal) distance education.” In fact, Buys writes that “studies have shown that there are at least two million preachers preaching in pulpits (in the Third World) who have never had any formal biblical training whatsoever.” This was ten years ago and the situation has had little change.

Second, Christianity is seeing an increased role of the local church. Much training is coming from within the Church, rather from without, and local churches provide non‐formal education for those taking leadership within their communities and for those being sent out. The role of SIBI is the major player in this area. (http://www.sunsetinternational.org/Links/Directory.htm)

The churches of Christ have approximately 172 schools throughout the world dedicated to the training of men and women to be servants of Christ. Fifty-seven of those schools (the number changes almost daily) are connected to the Sunset International Bible Institute. For the past 46 years thousands of individuals have received through knowledge in Bible through the efforts of SIBI. These students are spread throughout the world. The proliferation of “world evangelism plans” by groups and individuals has continued to increase as churches have mobilized to spread the gospel into the far reaches of the world. These efforts have resulted in thousands of people coming to Christ and hundreds of new churches being established.

However, at the same time there has not been corresponding attention give to developing leaders who will be able to direct and administer the work of God in a dynamic manner. Consequently we have a deficit of biblical leaders, and with an increase in new churches, there is an increasing deficit of leaders. While formal institutions cannot meet the need, non‐formal methods of leadership development hold a great deal of potential. For this reason, developing these models is of vital importance to the church and should be a priority of the Apollos Institute as we seek to aid the Third World Churches in their developing.

We want to assist you, the deans and leaders in these areas of the world, in training local leaders who can duplicate that process within the local community and congregation.

This crisis of leader development, unless it is addressed, will result in the loss of much of the harvest of souls!

"In God We Trust"

Badges to express a political idea, support a candidate, support a religious belief, or just to be humorous have been around for a long time. There are cases where the absence of a “badge” indicated that you did not support that cause; though I think that point of view cannot be warranted. I’m not a “badge” person. I don’t like any bumper sticker on my car and you will not find them there even though I fully support an issue. Recently an employee was fired from a prominent chair store because he was wearing a lapel badge that expressed his point of view. It simply stated “In God We Trust.” The reason given for his was that “it might offend someone.” I think that is rather ridiculous since the money being earned by the chain store has that expression stamped on it.

"In God we Trust" has been the foundation of the U.S.'s development of freedom. Remove that foundation and all signage expressions are suspect of being against the sensibility of any person who wants to complain. It is particularly ominous when I see the removal of all "Christian" references from buildings, school functions, and private public life. This phenomenon has gradually become more and more overt and open. I fear that like the "frog in the kettle" we are slowly being boiled. It will only be after we have lost most if not all our "freedoms" that we will one day wake up to a world radically different than the one you and I knew as we were growing up. When someone wears a button (tee shirt, jacket, bumper sicker, or sign) stating his or her particular view should be encouraged whether we believe what they say or not. Frankly, some of the signage I see sickens, angers, and embarrasses me; but I respect their right. The problem believers are facing is that we are being excluded and exempt from that rule of freedom. It applies to everyone but the Christian. Until we do something to change our self-imposed direction and complacent compliance our own destiny is also fixed.

However, I also do not believe that we should open the door for the U.S. to make the government "Christian" or "Jewish" or "you fill in the blank." I believe that to be taking a path that would lead us deeper into the woods. To combine religion with a political system produces a crucible for corruption of ideas, control of free thought, and a persecution of those who disagree with the governmental/religious mandates established by the state. In other words, I am against any cohesion of church and state. I want to keep them separate. I believe this would open up a system of government ripe for dictatorship. Muslims would love such a blending for it falls right into their system of belief. But any radical belief could be capable of squashing freedom of belief, even Christianity.

In our search for freedom, prosperity, and happiness, we humans have established an alliance of relative values, which form the basis of laws, social interaction, politics, and religious expression. That is, instead of the voice of God thru absolute revelation (Bible) we are establishing rules and laws that are popular and what the majority of people want. I think this has opened the "Pandora's box" that rewards all who support the common ideals, but punishes anyone who challenges them. Because we are listening to the "voice of the people", we shun the absolute demands of Truth and the radical nature of faith in favor of popular desires and values. As a nation we have accepted abortion, the gay agenda, immoral lifestyles, political correctness, and a host of other popular agendas simply because that is the will of the people, or at least the popular view. Opposition to such ideas because one accepts biblical standards usually gets one into a heap of trouble from those who have problems with Christian beliefs. It always has.

I take comfort in knowing that when an immoral world starts opposing what I am doing or saying then I know I must be own a path which is moral and right. But even conflict with the world does not establish the rightness or wrongness of my position. It is when, after consulting God and His absolute revelation that I can feel secure and can have confidence that my path has a solid foundation. “In God We Trust.”